Legal Opinion

Rocca v. Tuolumne County Electric Power & Light Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1926No. Docket No. 3052PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff, as the administrator of Lige "William Rocca, deceased, prosecutes this action under the provisions of section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the interest of Marguerite Rocca, mother of the deceased. Plaintiff had judgment in the sum of $12,000. A motion for a new trial being denied, defendant appeals to this court from said judgment.

After setting forth some preliminary matters, the complaint alleges that the defendant is a corporation organized for furnishing electricity for lighting and power purposes and was maintaining a line of wires, poles, etc., for carrying and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Scally v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API