Legal Opinion

Greenleaf v. Briggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1947No. Civ. 3540PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Defendant and respondent Bakersfield and Kern Electric Railway Company is a public utility operating buses on the public streets of Bakersfield. Defendant and respondent William Briggs was the operator of the bus here involved. A bus stop sign, near plaintiff’s home, was located at a point between 227 and 229 South Chester Avenue, near the curb. The sidewalk at that point extended to the curb, which provided a flat level place to discharge passengers. Within a few feet from this sign a concrete driveway sloped to the street from the sidewalk at an angle of about 30 degrees.

On March 27, 1945,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Falls v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Sanchez v. Pacific Auto StagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Longway v. McCallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. McIntyre v. Smoke Tree Ranch StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Tradewind Transportation Company, Limited (Formerly Known as Allen Tours of Hawaii, Ltd.) v. Bernice (Terry) TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. González Díaz v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API