Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Nott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 23, 2002No. 02-040PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a dispute over the construction of a local zoning ordinance pertaining to the operation of a home business. Town of Hartford (the “Town”) appeals from a ruling of the environmental court holding that § 3-12.2 of the Hartford Zoning Regulations requires that “no more than three employees who are not full-time residents of the dwelling shall be employed at the dwelling.” The Town argues that the environmental court’s interpretation of § 3-12.2 is clearly erroneous, based on the plain meaning of the ordinance. Appellee Raymond Nott argues to the contrary, and further challenges the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Badger v. Town of FerrisburghSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In Re Tyler Self-Storage Unit PermitsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Appeal of CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. In re St. Mary's Church Cell TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. In Re Hartland Group North Avenue PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API