In Re Appeal of Nott
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
This is a dispute over the construction of a local zoning ordinance pertaining to the operation of a home business. Town of Hartford (the “Town”) appeals from a ruling of the environmental court holding that § 3-12.2 of the Hartford Zoning Regulations requires that “no more than three employees who are not full-time residents of the dwelling shall be employed at the dwelling.” The Town argues that the environmental court’s interpretation of § 3-12.2 is clearly erroneous, based on the plain meaning of the ordinance. Appellee Raymond Nott argues to the contrary, and further challenges the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In re Vermont National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Badger v. Town of FerrisburghSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Tyler Self-Storage Unit PermitsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Appeal of CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re St. Mary's Church Cell TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In Re Hartland Group North Avenue PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.