Cottrell v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Appellant May Tucker Cottrell, the widow of Carl Tucker, appealed from a judgment which denied her claim for workmen’s compensation by reason of the verdict which found that the injury to Carl Tucker was not a producing cause of his death, and that his death was solely caused by heart disease independent of the injury. She seeks a reversal because the trial court refused to give her requested instruction about “injury” and because certain testimony about her husband’s health and condition was excluded. We affirm the judgment.
Appellee admitted that Tucker sustained an injury, but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. BrantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- The Southern Underw't'rs v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Southern Underwriters v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bobbie Brooks, Inc. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Minor v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Rivas v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971