Legal Opinion

Bobbie Brooks, Inc. v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1978No. 5120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADBURY, Justice.

This is a suit by Joseph Goldstein, plaintiff, against Bobbie Brooks, Inc., defendant, for commissions earned as a salesman and for attorney’s fees. The case was tried to a jury which answered all issues in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was entered for Gold-stein. Defendant appeals and we affirm.

Commencing in 1959, Goldstein was associated with M & D Simon Company as a salesman of men’s sportswear. His commissions were five percent of his sales and he paid his own expenses. Goldstein testified that his five percent commissions were based on 85 percent of “accepted bookings”.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cooper Petroleum Co. v. LaGloria Oil and Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Metal Structures Corp. v. Plains Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Tenneco Oil Company v. Padre Drilling CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zamora v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Sinko v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  3. Queen City Land Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Goff v. Southmost Savings & Loan Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Mother & Unborn Baby Care of North Texas, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API