Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Beachy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1919No. 22,001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiffs sued to compel, the defendants to issue to them certain certificates of stock in the State Bank of Esbon and to cancel outstanding certificates then held by Richard Beachy. The issues were so framed as to include a much wider controversy than indicated by what is called the application for the writ, and the trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal.

„ H. B. Keim, R. S. Beachy and M. J. Beachy were in the banking business at Esbon and owned all the capital stock of the State Bank except'…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hammond v. HastingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Kelly v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Abilene State Bank v. StrachanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Faulkner v. Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutson ex rel. Templar v. Imperial Royalties Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Mitchell v. BeachySupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Lilley v. Sterling Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Midwest State Bank v. SandidgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API