Legal Opinion

Lilley v. Sterling Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1921No. 22,845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for the alleged conversion of certain shares of stock issued by the defendant company and which it canceled and suppressed when the certificate was presented to it for transfer.

One Eugene Jackson, secretary of the defendant, the Sterling Oil & Refining Company, who had custody of its stock book, issued to himself, without compensation and without authority, 232,500 shares of its capital stock. The stock was of a character which could only be lawfully issued with the sanction of the state charter board (“Blue-sky” Law, Gen.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hammond v. HastingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Shields v. W. R. Grace & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Faulkner v. Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Mitchell v. BeachySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutson ex rel. Templar v. Imperial Royalties Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Hutson ex rel. Templar v. Imperial Royalties Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Mayse v. Minneola Cooperative ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API