Faulkner v. Bank of Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
E. 0. Faulkner brings this original proceeding in, mandamus to compel the Bank of Topeka to transfer to him on its books certain shares of its capital stock. The bank refuses to make the transfer because it claims a lien on the stock. The stock was owned formerly by C. J. Devlin, to whom was issued a certificate therefor in the following form:
“No. 449.' Shares $100 each. No. Shares 25. This is to certify that Chas. J. Devlin is entitled to twenty-five (25) shares of $100 each in the capital stock of the Bank of Topeka, Kansas, transferable at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robert Y. Brent, Surviving of Robert Brent, Use of the United States v. The President and Directors of the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Union Bank of Georgetown v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hammond v. HastingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Peoples Bank v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelly v. Central Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Abilene State Bank v. StrachanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Hess v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Kansas State Bank v. LaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Rosenfeld v. HorwichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.