Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. Reed

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1997No. 22786PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Justice.

This case involves an action for waste brought by remaindermen against a tenant for life. The tenant for life alleged affirmative defenses and counterclaims including breach of contract, setoff, undue influence, fraud, and constructive trust. The district court dismissed all of the affirmative defenses and counterclaims alleged by the tenant for life. The jury found that the tenant for life caused waste to the lawn, shrubs, and trees which were a part of the life estate in the amount of $750.

I

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On July 30, 1993, the respondents Clifford E. Kimbrough…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Reis v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Sun Valley v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Frank v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brown v. GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Nerco Minerals Co. v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. WATKINS CO., LLC v. StormsIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Horkley v. HorkleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API