Legal Opinion
Laffer v. Levinson, Miller, Jacobs & Phillips
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1995No. B077472PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
Plaintiff and appellant Martin G. Laffer brought this action for intentional interference with economic relations, conspiracy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, against the following defendants and respondents (who are a law firm and two of its partners and an associate attorney): Levinson, Miller, Jacobs & Phillips (hereafter LMJ&P), Steven B. Yankelevitz, Stanton Lee Phillips, and Michael D. Morris. The theory of appellant’s action is that certain statements made by defendants to a third party, Donald S. Jacobs, damaged appellant by causing Jacobs to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Block v. Sacramento Clinical Labs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.