Legal Opinion
Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 9, 2002No. SC 16540PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the defendant second injury fund (fund) maybe assessed
*23a penalty, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-3031 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), on attorney’s fees it paid after the prescribed time limitation for “[p]ayments due under an award,” when the fees were included in an award pursuant to General Statutes § 31-300.2 The fund *24appeals3 from the decision of the compensation review board (review board) that reversed the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the fourth district (commissioner), which had denied the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bridgeman v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Link v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.