Allen v. Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Monte Allen appeals a decision of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission dismissing as moot his petition for compulsory unitization of two oil and gas leases that expired the day after Allen petitioned. We hold that the commission has discretion to order unitization effective upon the date of filing of a proper petition and that its exercise of this discretion is a matter for case-specific determination rather than a matter of jurisdiction. Because the commission does not dispute that Allen's petition was proper when filed or that a retroactive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buttes Resources Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Bennion v. Utah State Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Ward v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Texaco Inc. v. Industrial Commission of the StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Alaska State Employees Ass'n/AFSCME Local 52Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Gottstein v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- AVCG, LLC v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Renaissance Alaska, LLC v. Rutter & Wilbanks Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.