Legal Opinion

AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. Totaro

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2009No. S-12207, S-12237PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

A property owner leased gravel mining rights to a lessee. The lessee in turn leased its rights to a sublessee. The sublessee assumed the lessee's duty to pay royalties to the property owner and agreed to pay overriding royalties to the lessee. The lessee later assigned the overriding royalties to an assignee. After more than a decade of operating under these arrangements, the subles-see purchased the property under a warranty deed with no title exception for the lease and then stopped paying the overriding royalties to the assignee.

The assignee sued the sublessee for the…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Shaffer v. BellowsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Zamarello v. RegesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Creekside Limited Partnership, Creekside-Alyeska, LLC, and Community Development, Inc. v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API