Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. A. Hynek & Sons Co. v. Board of Appeals
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1954PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
If the protesting letter is considered an appeal from the determination of the building inspector the record shows that it was not taken until fifty-one days had passed nor was the appeal heard for another twenty-one days after the filing of the appeal with the board. In State ex rel. Russell v. Board of Appeals (1947), 250 Wis. 394, 397, 27 N. W. (2d) 378, we quoted with approval a Pennsylvania decision holding:
“ ‘It is well settled . . . that where statutory remedies are provided, the procedure prescribed by the statute must be strictly pursued,- to the exclusion of other methods of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Colteryahn Sanitary Dairy v. Milk Control CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Wisconsin Labor Relations Board v. Fred Rueping Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Schintgen v. Mayor of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Sohns v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Brookside Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Jefferson County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Badtke v. School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.