Legal Opinion

Sohns v. Jensen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

1. Was there an adequate administrative remedy? The defendant contends that the plaintiffs had an adequate administrative remedy which they did not exhaust. In its written opinion the court stated that the plaintiffs were entitled to maintain this suit under sec. 59.97 (8), Stats. While this part of the decision is not in the findings of fact, this court may refer to the opinion to supplement the findings. Estate of Wallace (1955), 270 Wis. 636, 72 N. W. (2d) 383. The court on appeal will also assume when a finding is not made on an issue which appears from the record to exist, that it was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hasslinger v. Village of HartlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Holzbauer v. RitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pennoyer v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Smith v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. State Ex Rel. Morehouse v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. MartwickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PalloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Krueger v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Brookside Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Jefferson County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API