Legal Opinion

Thiel v. Damrau

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

This appeal involves an unfortunate controversy between neighbors as to the true location of a boundary line separating their premises. Plaintiffs are the record owners of lots 5, 6, and 7 in Tearney’s subdivision in the community of Okauchee, in the town of Oconomowoc, Waukesha county, while the defendant is the record owner of lot 8 in said subdivision. The west boundary line of lot 7 forms the east boundary line of lot 8, and it is the location of this line that is the' crux of the controversy. All four lots front on a public highway known as Tearney drive, which forms the north boundary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quass v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Engmann v. Estate of ImmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Maes v. OlmstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Schmidt v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Entzminger v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. TrudeauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Resseguie v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API