Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Bartine

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided March 3, 1909PublishedCited by 25 opinions

In Equity. With this case has been consolidated in this court the cases of the Nevada & California Railway Company, the San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, the Eureka & Palisade Railway Company, the Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad Company, and the Virginia & Truckee Railway against the same defendants.

Read the full summary

In Equity. With this case has been consolidated in this court the cases of the Nevada & California Railway Company, the San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, the Eureka & Palisade Railway Company, the Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad Company, and the Virginia & Truckee Railway against the same defendants. March 22, 1865 (St. 1865, p. 427, c. 146), the Legislature of the state of Nevada passed an act entitled “An act to provide for the incorporation of railroad companies, and the management of the affairs thereof, and other matters relating thereto.” The first 16 sections of the act…

1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above), 'filíese suits were brought to prevent enforcement of the so-called “Railroad Commission Law” on the ground that it is repugnant to the federal and to the state Constitutions. Substantially the same issues are raised in each case, therefore all will be considered together. 1. The title of the act (St. 1Í307, p. 73, c. 44) is as follows:

“An act to regulate railroads, telegraph and telephone companies and other common carriers in this state, creating a liailroad Commission, constituting the Governor, the Lieutenant-Governor, and the Attorney-General a…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Electric Railway v. Railroad CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. PelosiArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rouse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Bergman v. KearneyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1917
  5. Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API