Legal Opinion
Bonilla v. Schjeldahl, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, Candy Manufacturing Co., Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), entered June 7, 1996, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing (a) the complaint insofar as asserted against it and (b) the counterclaim by the third-party defendant Poly-Pak Industries, Inc., and Schjeldahl, Inc., a/k/a Sheldahl, Inc., a/k/a G.T. Schjeldahl Co. separately appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the order as denied its motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wyda v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Frey v. Rockford Safety Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Csoka v. BlissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Alvarado v. Otto Martin Maschinebau Gmbh & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hernandez v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Luis Liriano v. Hobart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998