Frey v. Rockford Safety Equipment Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted summary judgment to defendants, the manufacturers of two safety components incorporated into a punch press, on the ground that plaintiff’s employer had modified and in fact defeated the purpose of the safety components, thus causing plaintiff’s injury. A manufacturer may not be cast in damages, either for negligence or for products liability, where, after the product leaves the manufacturer’s hands, there is a subsequent modification that substantially alters the product and is the proximate cause of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Magee v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kingsland v. Industrial Brown Hoist Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Cacciola v. Selco Balers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Moore v. Deere & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Ernest v. S.M.S. Engineering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.