Legal Opinion

Frey v. Rockford Safety Equipment Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted summary judgment to defendants, the manufacturers of two safety components incorporated into a punch press, on the ground that plaintiff’s employer had modified and in fact defeated the purpose of the safety components, thus causing plaintiff’s injury. A manufacturer may not be cast in damages, either for negligence or for products liability, where, after the product leaves the manufacturer’s hands, there is a subsequent modification that substantially alters the product and is the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Magee v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Kingsland v. Industrial Brown Hoist Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Cacciola v. Selco Balers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. Moore v. Deere & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Ernest v. S.M.S. Engineering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API