Legal Opinion

Prehired, LLC v. Provins

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 12, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00384Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PREHIRED, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-00384-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY 14 MATTHEW PROVINS, RESTRAINING ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Prehired LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for a 18 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 5.) Defendant Matthew Provins 19 (“Defendant”) has filed an opposition. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has filed a reply. (ECF No. 23.) 20 For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 21…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API