Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Browning

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 1, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

In this proceeding the respondents are a corporation and the individual who was the president thereof and sole stockholder therein. The petition alleges that this corporation corrupted an agent of the estate and procured funds of the estate in ostensible payment for coal delivered to property of the estate paying over to the allegedly corrupted agent of the estate graft in consideration of his approval of such sales and graft intended to influence his actions in relation to such sales and deliveries thereunder. A motion has been made to dismiss the proceeding for insufficiency.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Donemar, Inc. v. MolloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. In re GickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of YoungNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. American Plumbing & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of PatenotreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  5. In re the Estate of MinevitchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API