Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Minevitch

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 11, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The administratrix of the decedent’s assets instituted a discovery proceeding under section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, for the purpose of compelling Irving Trust Company to deliver to her “ certain money, or other per*444sonal property, of Borah Minevitch * * * namely, $1,850 which should be delivered to [the] petitioner.” Irving Trust Company denies that it has any money or other personal property belonging to the decedent. It further contends that this court has no jurisdiction to grant the relief demanded by the petitioner.

The facts have been stipulated. It appears…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of LusherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of FraleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  5. In Re the Estate of SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API