Legal Opinion

Donemar, Inc. v. Molloy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

Briefly stated, the claim of the plaintiff is that defendant Molloy corrupted defendant Cafferky, an employee of plaintiff, when acting for his employer in the adjustment of a disputed claim for merchandise sold which Molloy had against plaintiff, with the result that plaintiff was induced to pay $57,500 in settlement of the claim, of which $4,555.05 went to Cafferky as a gratuity or compensation for Cafferky’s efforts to obtain a settlement favorable to Molloy. Judgment is demanded against defendants for this sum. The complaint contains the following allegation:

“ Eighth. Pursuant to said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Merchants' Line v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Brockport-Holley Water Co. v. Village of BrockportNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Novartis Corp. v. Luppino (In Re Luppino)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Continental Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. GarrityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Marr v. TumultyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API