Legal Opinion
Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch, Inc. v. Buick
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1999No. 98CA0048PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
In this action involving restrictive covenants, defendants, Donald Buick; Mad Ventures, Ltd.; Sorrell Hills Development Corp.; Lot 6 at Castle Peak Ranch RLLP; and Lamm Developments, Ltd., appeal a judgment entered against them and in favor of plaintiffs, Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch, Inc., John Pringle, Paul Koze, Jerry Dillon, and Gretta Parks. We affirm.
This appeal arises primarily out of a dispute between the plaintiff homeowners’ association and Buick, the subdivision’s developer, over construction of a dirt road within an access easement along the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Vinyard v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Buick v. Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- In Re the Marriage of BurfordColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Littlefield v. BambergerColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Horton v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.