Day v. Allstate Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Frank and Mary Day appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Mead, J.) contending that the court erred when it held that William McLaughlin was not an underin-sured operator pursuant to 24-A M.R.S.A. § 2902 (1990 & Supp.1998). 1 We disagree and affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The Days suffered serious injuries when their car was struck by a truck driven by McLaughlin. McLaughlin died in the accident, and his wife, a passenger in his truck, was injured. York Mutual Insurance Group (York) insured McLaughlin pursuant to a combined single limit policy of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenvall v. Maine Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Mullen v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- McGillivray v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Botting v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saucier v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Molleur v. Dairyland InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Derosier v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003