Legal Opinion

Derosier v. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 31, 2003No. 01-106Published

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. This is a declaratory judgment action concerning the level of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage available to a single insured who is among the multiple injured persons with claims against the tortfeasor’s single-limit policy. The issue is whether, in such situations, Vermont law requires the liability limits of the tortfeasor’s policy to be compared to the per person or the per accident limits of the injured insured’s split-limit UM/UIM coverage. In its summary judgment ruling, the superior court concluded that because the tortfeasor’s policy was subject to multiple claims as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Botting v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Day v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API