Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Cohoon & Ziman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided January 4, 1983No. 8110SC1214PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
By Assignment of Error Nos. 1 and 2, Ziman raises issues regarding enforceability of the partnership agreement’s arbitration clause and application of the Federal Arbitration Act. Judge Herring concluded in his judgment:(3) The Partnership Agreement is “a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce” within the meaning of § 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-14 (1976), and the provisions therein with respect to arbitration are valid and enforceable.
Ziman contends that under a recent decision by our Supreme Court, Board of Education v. Shaver Partnership,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Metro Industrial Painting Corp. v. Terminal Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Federal Commerce & Navigation Company, Limited v. Kanematsu-Gosho, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Patton v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boynton v. ESC Medical System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- RIVERFRONT PROP. LTD. v. Max Factor IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Turner v. Nicholson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Carpenter v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- In Re the Arbitration Between the State & Davidson & Jones Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.