Legal Opinion

Boynton v. ESC Medical System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2002No. COA01-635PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Defendants LUXAR Corporation and ESC Medical System, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions: 1) to compel arbitration; 2) for automatic stay; and 3) to dismiss.

Defendant LUXAR Corporation and plaintiff Edward Boynton executed a Sales Representative Agreement [Agreement] on 1 July 1997. LUXAR was a Washington corporation with its principal place of business in Bothell, Washington. LUXAR manufactured and sold waveguide fibers, CO2 lasers and other medical products. Boynton was a sales representative operating out of Greensboro, North Carolina.

The Agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Raspet v. BuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Turner v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. SwicegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Szymczyk v. Signs Now Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Ellen v. A.C. Schultes of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. T.M.C.S., Inc. v. Marco Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Hobbs Staffing Services, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API