Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 28, 1972No. 37, Docket 72-1366PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Milton Pollack, J., that remanded an arbitration proceeding to the arbitrators to fulfill their “obligation to furnish some explanation of the ultimate findings embodied in their decision.” 338 F.Supp. 287, 299 (1971). We hold that in the circumstances of this case the arbitrators have no such obligation to explain their award, and we reverse the order of the district court.
I
The arbitration that led to this appeal was first requested in November 1967…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Duferco International Steel Trading v. T. Klaveness Shipping A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, Bv v. Standard Microsystems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.