State v. Henderson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
The state appeals the trial court’s suppression of evidence discovered during a lawful pat-down search of defendant Brian Henderson. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress showed that at 11:30 p.m. on April 28, 2002, Columbus police officers David Horiuchi, Michael Danke, and Vernon Harris were on patrol in a known drug and prostitution area. The officers observed Henderson, another man, and a well-known prostitute standing together in the parking lot of an apartment complex. The apartment complex was a known drug…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Patman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Sudduth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- In re C.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- State v. CosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.