Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 2003No. A03A1611PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s suppression of evidence discovered during a lawful pat-down search of defendant Brian Henderson. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress showed that at 11:30 p.m. on April 28, 2002, Columbus police officers David Horiuchi, Michael Danke, and Vernon Harris were on patrol in a known drug and prostitution area. The officers observed Henderson, another man, and a well-known prostitute standing together in the parking lot of an apartment complex. The apartment complex was a known drug…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Patman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Sudduth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. In re C.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. State v. CosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API