Legal Opinion

State v. Cosby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 2010No. A09A1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Gene Cosby, Jr., was indicted for burglary. The trial court granted Cosby’s motion to suppress twenty-four rings and three pairs of earrings seized from his pocket, on the ground that their seizure exceeded the scope of a pat-down search performed under Terry v. Ohio. The state appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the plain feel doctrine set forth in Minnesota v. Dickerson 2 authorized the officer to seize the jewelry after feeling it during the pat-down search. Finding that the seizure was authorized, we reverse.

The pertinent evidence is uncontroverted, and no question regarding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. May v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. May v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. State v. Perry AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API