Dunn v. State

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Julian Dunn appeals from his convictions for attempting to manufacture methamphetamine, conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine, and impeding the flow of traffic. Dunn contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and by failing to give a specific venue charge to the jury. He further contends that insufficient evidence supports his conviction for impeding traffic flow. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. When “reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, evidence is construed most favorably…