Legal Opinion

In re C.C.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 6, 2009No. 08-287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress an ecstasy pill removed from his pocket without a warrant during a weapons pat-down. He argues that the State did not meet the “immediately apparent” probable cause standard for removal of the pill under the “plain-feel” doctrine, an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. The State responds that the warrantless removal of the pill was legal under the plain-feel doctrine because the officer was in a lawful position to feel the pill and its incriminating character, and that he had the lawful right to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Murphy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re G. V.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. In Re CCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. State v. DelaozSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. OneySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API