Legal Opinion
Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 30, 1986No. Nos. 84-2827, 84-2863 and 84-2864PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
In Donovan v. Fitzsimmons, 778 F.2d 298 (7th Cir.1985), a panel of this court affirmed an order of the district court approving the settlement of actions brought by participants in the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (CSPF) against the various named defendants alleging that the benefit eligibility rules for pension payments were arbitrary, unreasonably restrictive and further, that the trustees had mismanaged the Funds' assets. We granted the Secretary of Labor’s petition for rehearing en banc to consider whether the district court properly…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.