Legal Opinion
Suarez v. Skateland Presents Laces, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In consolidated actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Herricks Foreplan Inc., Diversified Foreplan Associates, L.P., Herbert Rudinger, Edna D. Stoothoff and Edna Elizabeth Stoothoff Miller appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), dated October 12, 1990, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellants, and the action against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Stewart v. HaleviymAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lafleur v. Power Test Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lynch v. Lom-Sur Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dufficy v. Wharf Bar & Grill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Wright v. FeinblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Meegan v. Westbury Property Investment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Vasquez v. RVA Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Reidy v. Burger King Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.