Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Haleviym

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 1992PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), dated June 27, 1990, as granted the defendant third-party plaintiffs motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that an owner of property is under no duty to pedestrians to remove ice and snow that naturally accumulates upon the sidewalk in front of his premises (Roark v Hunting, 24 NY2d 470, 475; Cannon v…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roark v. HuntingNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Spicehandler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Herrick v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Schlausky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Glassman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Booth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Keane v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Oley v. Village of Massapequa ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Kennedy v. C & C New Main Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Lakhan v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API