Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1933No. 23318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This is an action for injunction. The city of Oklahoma City, through its constituted officers, awarded a contract to the Western Paving Company to resurface a portion of Seventeenth street in said city. This work was completed. Plaintiffs, as property owners, affected by such improvement, seek an injunction against said city, its governing body, and the Western Paving Company to cancel said contract for improvement and to enjoin said city from taking any action toward the levy and collection of the assessment made against the property of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs alleged, in substance, that on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Riley, County Clerk v. CaricoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Hager v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Muskogee v. RamboSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riedt v. City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Decker v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Connelly Bros. v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API