Legal Opinion
SubTeach USA v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided November 4, 2009No. E09-21PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN R. BAKER, Judge.
liSubTeachUSA challenges the Department of Workforce Services, the Arkansas Appeal Tribunal, and the Board of Review, all of which found that LaJuanda Coleman was eligible for unemployment benefits. The Board of Review (Board) affirmed the Appeal Tribunal’s finding that Coleman did not perform services in an instructional capacity for an educational institution in the previous academic term and did not have a reasonable assurance of returning to such work in the next academic term. On appeal, SubTeachUSA alleges that Arkansas Code Annotated section 11-10-509(a)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Teston v. Arkansas State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Coker v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Williams v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- SubTeach USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Carneyhan v. Trigg County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- SubTeach USA v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009