State v. Hessler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
The appeal from the court of appeals is dismissed. State v. Smith (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 89, 684 N.E.2d 668.
Appellant presents nine propositions of law for our consideration. See Appendix. We have carefully considered each proposition, independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the evidence presented in mitigation, and reviewed the death penalties for appropriateness and proportionality. For the following reasons, we affirm the convictions and uphold the death penalties.
Reasonable-Doubt Instruction
In his first proposition of law, appellant finds…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.