Legal Opinion
United States v. Seventy-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-One Dollars
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 7, 2007No. Civil Action 05-1364 (RBW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
On July 6, 2005, the plaintiff, the United States of America (“government”), filed the civil forfeiture in rem complaint in this matter against $79,321 in United States currency that was seized from luggage allegedly belonging to Santos Efrain Flores (“Flores”). Thereafter, on August 30, 2006, the government filed an Amended Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (“Compl.”) against the same property. In its amended complaint, the government alleges that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture pursuant to: (1) 31 U.S.C. § 5317(c)(2) (2000)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet AircraftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number XXXXXXXXDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Real Property and PremisesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- United States v. $215, 587.22 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- City of Meridian v. $104,960.00 U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.