Legal Opinion
Gray v. Little
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1929No. Docket No. 3676PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This action was brought by appellant as trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a transfer made by the bankrupt within four months of the bankruptcy proceedings, and during the alleged insolvency of the bankrupt, upon the ground that a voidable preference was thereby created.
It appears from the evidence that respondent and William M. Brown, for a period of four years prior to May 24, 1926, were copartners engaged in the cleaning and dyeing business in the city of Marysville, under the name of “Brown’s Cleaning & Dyeing Works,’’ respondent owning a one-third interest in said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smiley v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Caledonian Coal Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Crocker v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Cate v. Certainteed Products Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Bennett v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Winther v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- International Canning Machinery, Ltd. v. Murrieta Hot Springs (In re Murrieta Hot Springs)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.