Legal Opinion

Stucky v. Masonic Savings Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1883No. 164PublishedCited by 75 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE OÍKCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Milleb

This suit originated in a hill in equity brought in the district court by Stucky, as assignee of Melter, a bankrupt, against the bank and against Jacob Krieger, Sr., for the purpose of having two mortgages made by the bankrupt declared void, and the -real estate covered by them sold free of the hen of those mortgages. The ground of this relief is the allegation that the mortgages were made by Melter When insolvent, and were preferences in. contemplation of bankruptcy, void by the bankrupt law, and that, by virtue of the bankrupt proceedings commenced within two months after they were made,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. In re EggertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
  2. Tumlin v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  3. First Nat. Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Putnam v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Cusick v. Second Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API