Legal Opinion

Bogle v. Armenakis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 2001No. 97C-10766; CA A102946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Petitioner asserts, among other things, that his trial counsel’s failure to object to jury instructions for first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and four counts of first-degree kidnapping, ORS 163.235, amounted to inadequate assistance of counsel in violation of Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.220, reverse in part, and otherwise affirm.

Petitioner’s prosecution arose from an episode that occurred on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. PervishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API