Hatlestad v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Peggy Bryant, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Jose Hatlestad, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Appellant’s single assignment of error states:
“The Trial Court erred in granting Defendant-Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; erroneously concluding that the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., preempted Plaintiff-Appellant’s state law claims.”
In his complaint plaintiff alleges that in June 1989, his employer, defendantappellee, Consolidated Rail Corporation…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Pyle v. PyleOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hanly v. Riverside Methodist HospitalsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Griswold v. Fresenius USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- DiPuccio v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Potocnik v. Sifco Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Heck v. Board of Trustees, Kenyon CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.