Legal Opinion

Potocnik v. Sifco Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1995No. 66668PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Judge.

Appellant and cross-appellee, Valentine Potocnik, is appealing the trial court’s order granting appellee and cross-appellant, Sifco Industries, Inc., its motion for a new trial. Appellee filed a cross-appeal asserting additional reasons why its motion for a new trial should have been granted. Sifco also contends the trial court should have granted its motion for a directed verdict, and should have dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand.

Appellant sued his employer, Sifco Industries, for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Premier Industrial Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Srail v. RJF International Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. O'Donnell v. N.E. Ohio Neighborhood Health Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Ward v. HengleOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Helfrich v. Mellon, 06-Ca-69 (6-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API