Legal Opinion
DiPuccio v. United Parcel Service
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 4, 1995No. 1:94CV0162PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff, a package car driver for defendant, worked under a collective bargaining agreement between defendant and Teamsters Local 407. He was injured in work-related accidents in 1989 and 1991. After surgery on his knees, he returned to work without restrictions.
On returning to work, plaintiff was supervised closely, including numerous “ride- alongs” with his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kirkendall v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Nieves v. Individualized ShirtsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Krahel v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1997
- Pryner v. Tractor Supply Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- Golenia v. Bob Baker ToyotaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.