Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
In 2010, American Action Network (“AAN”)—a tax-exempt section 501(c)(4) organization—spent $1,065,000 on three versions of the following television advertisement, which ran in the districts of three different candidates for Congress in the lead-up to that year’s election:
[On-screen text:] Congress doesn’t want you to read this. Just like [candidate], [Candidate] & Nancy Pelosi rammed through government healthcare. Without Congress reading all the details. $500 billion in Medicare cuts. Free healthcare for illegal immigrants.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grace v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Citizens for Responsibility v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.