Legal Opinion
United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual Daas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1999No. 98-10490PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, District Judge:
Abdul Daas appeals his jury conviction and sentence for distributing listed chemicals, specifically ephedrine and pseu-doephedrine, with reasonable cause to believe they would be used to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(2). 2
Daas contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(2) criminalizes the distribution of pure ephedrine or pseu-doephedrine but not the distribution of a mixture, such as Mini Thins and Pseudo Thins, containing these chemicals; (2) the prosecutor improperly vouched…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Maria Martinez-Rosas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave SwiekertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hoa Hong Van v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.