Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Du Puis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1963PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages for loss of consortium, brought by a husband whose wife was injured in an automobile collision. The defendant appeals from a judgment which awarded damages to the husband upon a verdict directed in his favor on the score of liability.

The trial court held that inasmuch as the plaintiff’s wife earlier had been awarded damages in an action arising out of the same collision, the issues of negligence and contributory negligence were res judicata. The jury was accordingly instructed that it need concern itself solely with the amount that would compensate the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Kosciolek v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ellis v. FALLERTOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Maxson v. TomekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API