Legal Opinion

Maxson v. Tomek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1935PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This case and five others,* all relating to the same transaction, were tried together. Special verdicts were rendered by the jury upon questions of fact submitted in writing by the court, after which the court directed general verdicts. Court and counsel treated these questions and special verdicts as effectual in all the cases on trial to which they might logically apply and proceeded throughout the trial on that theory. In this action and the action of Albert Tomek against Reynolds and Beatrice Maxson the special verdicts were consistent but the general verdicts directed were inconsistent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. McKay v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Kramer v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wolff v. Du PuisOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Maidman v. StaggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Wilson v. KuenziSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Reilly v. RawleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API